Why Trump is Blaming Iran for Ship Attacks the US Navy Actually Carried Out

Why Trump is Blaming Iran for Ship Attacks the US Navy Actually Carried Out

The narrative coming out of Washington right now is messy, contradictory, and flat-out dangerous for international shipping. Donald Trump just took to Truth Social to rip into Iran, accusing the country of negotiating in bad faith over a peace deal and executing a drone strike on merchant ships carrying Indian seafarers. There is just one massive problem with his story. The United States military already admitted that American forces fired the missiles that hit those ships.

When you peel back the layers of this diplomatic blow-up, you find a chaotic mix of a high-stakes peace framework falling apart, a tightening naval blockade, and civilian mariners caught directly in the crossfire.

The Truth Social Outburst and the Blame Game

Trump didn't hold back in his late-night post. He claimed the leaked terms of a 14-point memorandum of understanding, which had been circulating in Iranian media, were completely fake. He called the leaks "dishonorable" and asserted they had nothing to do with what was agreed to in writing.

Then came the kicker. Trump added that Iran carried out a "totally rebuffed drone attack" against Indian ships leaving the Strait of Hormuz. He warned Tehran they better get their act together fast.

"The terms that Iran leaked out to the Fake News have NOTHING to do with the terms that were agreed to, in writing... Also, their totally rebuffed Drone attack last night against Indian Ships leaving the Hormuz Strait is TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE."
- Donald Trump, Truth Social

But look at the timeline of the last few days. US Central Command (CENTCOM) confirmed on Thursday that American naval forces targeted and struck the Guinea-Bissau-flagged tanker MT Jalveer in the Gulf of Oman. The US military claimed the vessel was violating the ongoing American naval blockade against Iran, so they fired two Hellfire missiles directly into the ship's engine room to disable it. The ship carried 20 Indian mariners.

This followed an even more tragic incident a day prior, where a US strike on the Palau-flagged tanker Settebello killed three Indian sailors, including 23-year-old Aditya Sharma. A third vessel, the Marivex, was disabled by American forces earlier in the week.

By trying to pin the blame on phantom Iranian drones, Washington is attempting to shift the narrative away from a brutal reality: the US military is actively killing and endangering citizens of one of its most critical global partners, India.

Why Indian Seafarers Are Stuck in the Middle

You can't talk about global commercial shipping without talking about India. The country is the second-largest supplier of seafarers in the world. When a geopolitical conflict breaks out in a major maritime choke point like the Strait of Hormuz, Indian mariners are almost always the ones standing on the decks of those targeted tankers.

New Delhi is absolutely furious about these developments, and they aren't hiding it. The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) just summoned the US ChargΓ© d'Affaires, Jason Meeks, for the second time in three days to lodge a bitter protest. MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal pointed out that these foreign-flagged vessels are being hit by deadly, lethal force from the US Navy stationed in the region.

Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Esmaeil Baqaei, didn't miss the opportunity to twist the knife, extending condolences to India while labeling the American naval operations as "armed robbery and State piracy."

It puts New Delhi in an incredibly awkward diplomatic position. Prime Minister Narendra Modi is expected to meet Trump on the sidelines of the upcoming G7 summit, where this issue will undoubtedly dominate behind-the-scenes talks. India expects its strategic partners to protect global trade routes, not blast holes into commercial ships manned by its citizens.

The Disputed Peace Deal and What Happens Next

While the blame game plays out in public, the underlying diplomatic framework is hanging by a thread. Just a day ago, Trump claimed he called off a third consecutive day of airstrikes because a "great settlement" was close.

Iranian media leaked what they claimed was a 14-point draft peace deal. According to reports from the Mehr and Fars news agencies, the proposal included:

  • An immediate 60-day ceasefire across all fronts, including Lebanon.
  • The lifting of the US naval blockade on Iranian ports.
  • The release of $24 billion in frozen Iranian assets.
  • Limited sanctions relief based on continued good faith engagement.

Crucially, the leaked Iranian draft contained zero new restrictions on Tehran's nuclear program. That seems to be the exact point where the deal fractured. Vice President JD Vance jumped onto social media to back Trump, calling the reports "fake information" and stating clearly that no cash or frozen funds would be released just for showing up to a meeting. Vance insisted that any actual deal is structured to ensure US and allied security concerns are prioritized first.

Iranian officials have also pushed back against the American narrative, stating that even if commercial shipping resumes, Iran will never relinquish its sovereign authority over the strategic waterway.

If you are a maritime operator or an exporter relying on the Gulf transit routes, the next steps are highly practical. Do not rely on political posturing or optimistic social media statements about imminent peace. The Directorate General of Shipping has already issued emergency security advisories for the region. Shipping companies need to immediately reroute high-value cargo where possible, ensure strict adherence to updated security protocols when transiting the Gulf of Oman, and prepare for extended naval blockades as both Washington and Tehran dig in their heels. The risk of miscalculation out there is currently at an all-time high.

HS

Hannah Scott

Hannah Scott is passionate about using journalism as a tool for positive change, focusing on stories that matter to communities and society.